Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Craig E. KREGER, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 22, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed for approximately six weeks as a per diem correction officer at the Delaware County Jail when he resigned based upon his perception that the combination of inadequate job training and understaffing at the jail placed him in physical danger. Claimant's subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied upon the ground that he had voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Although fear for one's safety may constitute good cause for leaving employment (see, Matter of De Witt [Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 601, 732 N.Y.S.2d 462; Matter of Halpern [Chapdelaine Corporate Sec.-Commissioner of Labor], 265 A.D.2d 702, 696 N.Y.S.2d 581), it first must be shown that the claimant had reasonable grounds to conclude that his or her safety was, in fact, endangered (see, Matter of Hughes [Hartnett], 198 A.D.2d 647, 648, 603 N.Y.S.2d 616, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 751, 611 N.Y.S.2d 133, 633 N.E.2d 488). In this matter, claimant presented no evidentiary support for the contention that his employment placed him in physical jeopardy. We therefore conclude that claimant's reasons for leaving his employment were correctly determined to be personal and noncompelling; hence, the Board's decision will not be disturbed.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 28, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)