Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Robert M. BRACCI, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 21, 2002, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
The record reveals that claimant requested to be laid off from his job as a bricklayer in part to attend to dental procedures and in part because he was not happy with the work. Thereafter, claimant failed to attend a scheduled meeting with the president of the company and was absent from work for two days due to doctor appointments. Under these circumstances, we find substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's finding that claimant's conduct reasonably led the employer to believe that claimant quit and, thus, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his job without good cause (see generally Matter of James [Commissioner of Labor], 285 A.D.2d 888, 728 N.Y.S.2d 588; Matter of Rivera [Catherwood], 29 A.D.2d 582, 285 N.Y.S.2d 393). Claimant's assertion that he did not quit raised a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Bradley [Hudacs], 190 A.D.2d 949, 593 N.Y.S.2d 596). Moreover, given claimant's statement on his application for benefits that his separation from employment was due to lack of work, we will not disturb the Board's finding that he made a willful misrepresentation or the Board's resultant assessment of a recoverable overpayment of benefits (see Matter of James [Commissioner of Labor], supra ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 31, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)