Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Angel CRUZ, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 21, 2001, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed by the City University of New York as the Director of Public Safety and Security at its Queens College campus. He was discharged from this employment after violating the employer's policy requiring all supervisory personnel to report to the College Sexual Harassment Panel any allegations of sexual harassment that had been made against a member of his or her staff.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant's employment was terminated due to misconduct. It is well settled that a claimant's knowing failure to comply with the employer's established policies and procedures can constitute disqualifying misconduct, especially in cases where such failure could jeopardize the employer's best interest (see, Matter of Huggins [Samaritan Med. Ctr.-Commissioner of Labor], 257 A.D.2d 877, 878, 684 N.Y.S.2d 73; Matter of Johnson [Wayandanch Day Care Ctr.-Commissioner of Labor], 257 A.D.2d 823, 824, 684 N.Y.S.2d 15). In this matter, claimant admitted that he had twice neglected to report allegations of sexual harassment that had been filed against members of his staff. His failure to do so prevented the employer from taking prompt action to address the allegations, thereby rendering it vulnerable to potential liability. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Board finding that claimant lost his job under disqualifying circumstances.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 29, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)