Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Donald A. HALL, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 15, 2000, which reduced claimant's weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant's unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero. When claimant's job was abolished, he chose one of three early retirement plans offered by the employer. Inasmuch as the record establishes that the retirement package was fully funded by the employer, we decline to disturb the Board's decision (see, Labor Law § 600[7]; see also, Matter of Cohen [Sweeney], 245 A.D.2d 934, 666 N.Y.S.2d 845; Matter of Richmond [Roberts], 96 A.D.2d 1132, 467 N.Y.S.2d 730).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 12, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)