Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Raymond R. HAMILTON, et al., appellants, v. CORONA READY MIX, INC., respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated June 29, 2004, which granted the defendant's motion for a change of venue from Kings County to Queens County.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see CPLR 511[d] ).
The Supreme Court erroneously granted the defendant's motion to change the venue of the instant action from Kings County to Queens County. Pursuant to CPLR 503(a), the venue of an action is proper in the county in which any of the parties resided at the time of commencement. The sole residence of a domestic corporation for venue purposes is the county designated in its certificate of incorporation, despite its maintenance of an office or facility in another county (see Graziuso v. 2060 Hylan Blvd. Rest. Corp., 300 A.D.2d 627, 753 N.Y.S.2d 103; Altidort v. Louis, 287 A.D.2d 669, 732 N.Y.S.2d 45). Here, the plaintiffs properly placed venue in Kings County, despite the fact that the defendant claimed that its office was located in Queens County, since Kings County was the county designated in the defendant's certificate of incorporation, and the defendant failed to prove that the certificate had been amended to designate a different county.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 15, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)