Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mark MISK, respondent, v. Joyce C. MOSS, et al., defendants, Angela O'Brien, appellant.
In an action, inter alia, for the partition and sale of real property, the defendant Angela O'Brien appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and amended judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kelly, J.), entered December 19, 2007, as, upon remittitur from this Court (see Misk v. Moss, 41 A.D.3d 672, 839 N.Y.S.2d 143), granted the plaintiff's motion to confirm a referee's report dated April 19, 2007, as adjusted, regarding the sale of the subject real property and the distribution of the proceeds therefrom, confirmed the report, and declined to award her consequential damages for the plaintiff's failure to proceed to closing on a previously-scheduled judicial sale of the subject property.
ORDERED that the order and amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the contention of the defendant Angela O'Brien, the plaintiff did not willfully default on the purchase of the subject real property, and O'Brien thus was not entitled to an award of consequential damages. The terms of the judicial sale conducted by the referee gave the successful bidder, in this case the plaintiff, the right to cancel the sale if the referee was unable to convey insurable title. The plaintiff demonstrated that an appeal filed by O'Brien in connection with the partition of the subject real property rendered title to that property uninsurable. Accordingly, the plaintiff acted within his rights in cancelling the sale (see Lisenenkov v. Kaszirer, 41 A.D.3d 282, 838 N.Y.S.2d 545; Gargano v. Rubin, 200 A.D.2d 554, 606 N.Y.S.2d 314; Patten of N.Y. Corp. v. Geoffrion, 193 A.D.2d 1007, 598 N.Y.S.2d 355; Costa v. District Nursing Assn. of N. Westchester, 175 A.D.2d 274, 572 N.Y.S.2d 727; Kopp v. Barnes, 10 A.D.2d 532, 204 N.Y.S.2d 860). O'Brien's remaining contentions in this regard are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 14, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)