Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Erasmo LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOWN FAIR SUPERMARKET, INC., et al., Defendants-Respondents, Florence D'Urso, as Trustee of the Residuary Trust Created by Camillo J. D'Urso, Deceased, Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant; County of Nassau, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff, Florence D'Urso, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feuerstein, J.), dated July 8, 1997, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, all cross claims insofar as asserted against her, and the counterclaims against her.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff allegedly broke his ankle when he stepped into an approximately six-inch deep hole while walking on a public sidewalk which abutted a building owned by the appellant. There was evidence in the record that a large drainage pipe located on the side of the building extended down into the sidewalk, causing water run-off to erode the sidewalk.
Liability may be imposed upon landowners whose property abuts a public sidewalk where the abutting landowner affirmatively caused or created the defect in the sidewalk (see, Hausser v. Giunta, 88 N.Y.2d 449, 453, 646 N.Y.S.2d 490, 669 N.E.2d 470; see also, Caturano v. City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 202, 637 N.Y.S.2d 140; Forelli v. Rugino, 139 A.D.2d 489, 526 N.Y.S.2d 847). In opposition to the appellant's motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact with respect to whether the appellant had created the dangerous condition which caused the plaintiff to fall. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 14, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)