Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SV SPACE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TOWN OF BABYLON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Babylon, dated November 5, 1997, the petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), entered April 17, 1998, as denied that branch of the petition which sought to review so much of the determination as limited the term of its special use permit to a period of two years.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the petition which sought to review so much of the determination as limited the term of the petitioner's special use permit to a period of two years is granted, and the two-year term limit is annulled.
The petitioner applied for, and was granted, a special use permit. However, the permit contained two conditions which were unacceptable to the petitioner. The first, a limitation on the hours that the petitioner could operate its business, was annulled by the Supreme Court in a portion of the judgment which has not been appealed from. The second, the subject of the instant appeal, is the two-year durational limit set by the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Babylon.
The two-year term limit at issue here must be annulled. The zoning ordinance does not provide for or contemplate durational limits in connection with the issuance of special use permits (Code of the Town of Babylon § 213-13). That being so, it was improper for the Board to include that limitation in the special use permit in question (see, Matter of St. Onge v. Donovan, 71 N.Y.2d 507, 527 N.Y.S.2d 721, 522 N.E.2d 1019; Matter of Long Is. Univ. v. Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Old Westbury, 122 A.D.2d 53, 54, 504 N.Y.S.2d 209; 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice §§ 23.55, 24.15 [3d ed.] ).
In light of this determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 16, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)