Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carolyn BUSH, Respondent, v. BRENTWOOD VETERANS WAR MEMORIAL, INC., et al., Appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated July 24, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she was a patron in the bar of the defendants' Veterans of Foreign Wars hall. One of her companions greeted her with a karate-type stance and she attempted to respond in kind with a “kung fu” style kick. As the plaintiff landed on the floor, one of her legs allegedly slipped on sawdust used in connection with an adjacent shuffleboard game, causing her to fall to the floor. During her deposition, she testified that she had observed the sawdust on the floor prior to engaging in the horseplay and described the alleged condition as “obvious.”
A landowner has no duty to warn of a dangerous condition that can readily be observed with the reasonable use of one's senses (see Dawson v. Cafiero, 292 A.D.2d 488, 739 N.Y.S.2d 190, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 610, 749 N.Y.S.2d 1, 778 N.E.2d 552), particularly where the plaintiff was actually aware of the condition (see Sandler v. Patel, 288 A.D.2d 459, 733 N.Y.S.2d 131). Since the sawdust upon which the plaintiff slipped and fell was readily observable by a reasonable use of her senses, and she saw and was aware of it prior to her accident, the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 24, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)