IN RE: Amanda FRIEDMAN (2008)

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), dated February 21, 2007, which, in effect, denied that branch of his motion which was to direct the mother to pay his one-half share of the fees of the court-appointed forensic expert and granted that branch of his motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee only to the extent of awarding him an attorney's fee in the sum of $10,000.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

 “The award of reasonable counsel fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court” (Walker v. Walker, 255 A.D.2d 375, 376, 680 N.Y.S.2d 114).   It “ ‘is to be based on the financial circumstances of the parties and the circumstances of the case as a whole, which may include the relative merit of the parties' positions, but should not be predicated solely on who won and who lost’ ” (Matter of Sullivan v. Sullivan, 40 A.D.3d 865, 867, 836 N.Y.S.2d 259, quoting Matter of O'Neil v. O'Neil, 193 A.D.2d 16, 20, 601 N.Y.S.2d 628).

 The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the mother to pay only a portion of the father's attorney's fees.   The Family Court's award of an attorney's fee in the sum of $10,000 was in addition to a previous award of an attorney's fee in the sum of $8,800, made to the father pursuant to an order of the same court dated July 24, 2006.   Given the circumstances of this case, including the relative merits of the parties' positions, and their respective financial circumstances, the award of an attorney's fee to the father in the total sum of $18,800 was appropriate (see Domestic Relations Law § 237;  Miklos v. Miklos, 21 A.D.3d 353, 800 N.Y.S.2d 561;  Klisivitch v. Klisivitch, 291 A.D.2d 433, 737 N.Y.S.2d 540;  Feeney v. Feeney, 241 A.D.2d 510, 511, 661 N.Y.S.2d 26).

 Further, the court providently exercised its discretion in allocating to him 50% of the forensic expert's fees (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a];  Matter of Bluemer v. Bluemer, 47 A.D.3d 652, 653, 850 N.Y.S.2d 514;  Matter of Mohammad v. Mohammad, 23 A.D.3d 476, 477, 805 N.Y.S.2d 89).