IN RE: Gustava GARCIA (2009)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Gustava GARCIA, etc., appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, respondent.

Decided: February 24, 2009

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., STEVEN W. FISHER, ANITA R. FLORIO, and EDWARD D. CARNI, JJ.

Aliazzo, McCloskey & Gonzalez, LLP, Ozone Park, N.Y. (Thomas P. McCloskey of counsel), for appellant. Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Neil R. Finkston of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e(5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kerrigan, J.), dated January 31, 2008, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the petitioner demonstrated that the respondent acquired knowledge of the incident and her injuries within 90 days of the occurrence, she failed to establish either that the respondent had acquired knowledge of the essential facts underlying the claim within that time, or that the respondent was not substantially prejudiced by reason of her delay in serving a notice of claim. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim (see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. New York City Tr. Auth., 35 A.D.3d 718, 828 N.Y.S.2d 416).

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network