Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MIDLANTIC COMMERCIAL LEASING CORP., respondent, v. Isaac LEVIN, appellant, et al., defendant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendant Isaac Levin appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated May 24, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of the same court (Shifrin, R.), dated July 12, 2002, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the total sum of $111,440.03.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
As a general rule, we do not consider any issues raised on a subsequent appeal that were raised, or could have been raised, in a prior appeal that was dismissed for lack of prosecution (see Bray v. Cox, 38 N.Y.2d 350, 353, 379 N.Y.S.2d 803, 342 N.E.2d 575), although we have the inherent discretion to consider such issues (see Rubeo v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 N.Y.2d 750, 756, 697 N.Y.S.2d 866, 720 N.E.2d 86). Here, we decline to exercise this discretion (see Pagones v. Maddox, 295 A.D.2d 489, 744 N.Y.S.2d 859).
The defendant Isaac Levin appealed from a prior judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated July 12, 2002, which, upon an order of the same court entered July 16, 1998, awarded the plaintiff the total sum of $111,440.03. That appeal (Appellate Division Docket No. 2003-08610) was dismissed by decision and order on motion of this court dated October 22, 2004, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the court rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.8) and an earlier decision and order on motion dated July 7, 2004.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 24, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)