Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Joseph J. McFOWLER, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 12, 2008, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive additional unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 599.
After losing his job as a maintenance worker, claimant received unemployment insurance benefits for 26 weeks, ending March 30, 2008. On April 10, 2008, claimant filed an application with the Department of Labor for additional career training benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 599 for the purpose of taking computer literacy training. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately denied his application and claimant now appeals.
We affirm. It is well settled that in order for a claimant to be entitled to additional career training benefits under Labor Law § 599, he or she must have been accepted into an approved program, or demonstrated an application for such a program, while still receiving regular unemployment benefits (see Matter of Schumer [Commissioner of Labor], 44 A.D.3d 1139, 1139-1140, 843 N.Y.S.2d 713 [2007]; Matter of Schroder [Commissioner of Labor], 38 A.D.3d 1142, 1143, 834 N.Y.S.2d 336 [2007] ). Here, the record is clear, and claimant does not dispute, that his application for the training program was made after the exhaustion of his regular benefits. As such, we conclude that the decision of the Board was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Schroder [Commissioner of Labor], 38 A.D.3d at 1143, 834 N.Y.S.2d 336).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 14, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)