Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Teresa O'CALLAGHAN, Appellant, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, et al., Respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated January 19, 2001, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To establish a prima facie case of negligence in a slip and fall case, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant created the condition that caused the accident, or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see Rabadi v. Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., 268 A.D.2d 418, 702 N.Y.S.2d 316; Rotunno v. Pathmark, 220 A.D.2d 570, 632 N.Y.S.2d 224; Bykofsky v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, 210 A.D.2d 280, 619 N.Y.S.2d 760). To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit a defendant's employees to discover and remedy it (see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774). The proponent of a summary judgment motion to dismiss the complaint based upon a lack of notice is required to make a prima facie showing affirmatively establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law (see Goldman v. Waldbaum, 248 A.D.2d 436, 669 N.Y.S.2d 669).
The defendants met their burden (see Rojas v. Supermarkets General Corp., 238 A.D.2d 393, 656 N.Y.S.2d 346; Fox v. Kamal Corp., 271 A.D.2d 485, 706 N.Y.S.2d 142). The plaintiff submitted no proof, only speculation, that the hazard upon which she allegedly slipped and fell remained on the floor for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit defendants' employees to discover and remedy it (see Anderson v. Klein's Foods, 139 A.D.2d 904, 527 N.Y.S.2d 897, affd. 73 N.Y.2d 835, 537 N.Y.S.2d 481, 534 N.E.2d 319; Bachrach v. Waldbaum, Inc., 261 A.D.2d 426, 689 N.Y.S.2d 531). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 13, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)