Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dennis H. MILLER, et al., appellants, v. David Neil LAPINE, et al., respondents-respondents, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate petitions designating David Neil Lapine, Linda Lebensold, David E. Eberle, Patricia Susan Fleming, Rich Perkins, David Sears, Richard Wolf, Jonah Triebwasser, Marirose Blumbump, Susan M. Simon, and Maureen McCarthy as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 18, 2007, for the nomination of the Working Families Party as its candidates for the public offices of Highway Superintendent of the Town of East Fishkill, Justice of the Town of Fishkill, Supervisor of the Town of Fishkill, Council Member of the Town of Fishkill, Council Member of the Town of Hyde Park-Ward 4, Justice of the Town of Poughkeepsie, Justice of the Town of Red Hook, Supervisor of the Town of Red Hook, Council Member of the Town of Red Hook, and Council Member of the Town of Wappinger-Ward 3, respectively, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated August 16, 2007, which granted the motion of David Neil Lapine, Linda Lebensold, David E. Eberle, Patricia Susan Fleming, Rich Perkins, David Sears, Richard Wolf, Jonah Triebwasser, Marirose Blumbump, Susan M. Simon, and Maureen McCarthy to dismiss the proceeding for failure to join a necessary party and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In seeking to invalidate the designating petitions based on the alleged failure of the Executive Committee of the State Committee of the Working Families Party (hereinafter the Executive Committee) to comply with Election Law § 6-108, the petitioners challenge the actions and authority of the Executive Committee. Accordingly, the Executive Committee is a necessary party to the proceeding, and the petitioners' failure to join it was jurisdictionally fatal (see CPLR 1001[a]; Matter of Flores v. Kapsis, 10 A.D.3d 432, 433, 780 N.Y.S.2d 798; Matter of Barbuto v. Sarcone, 275 A.D.2d 424, 425, 713 N.Y.S.2d 128; Matter of Jenkins v. Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 270 A.D.2d 436, 437, 705 N.Y.S.2d 64; Matter of Regan v. New York State Bd. of Elections, 207 A.D.2d 647, 616 N.Y.S.2d 109; Matter of Oberle v. Caracappa, 133 A.D.2d 241, 518 N.Y.S.2d 990; Matter of Curcio v. Wolf, 133 A.D.2d 188, 189, 518 N.Y.S.2d 694). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the motion to dismiss the proceeding.
In light of our determination, we need not address the parties' remaining contentions.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 22, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)