Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Samuel L. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Inmate Disciplinary Program for the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possessing a weapon and possessing an altered item. The detailed misbehavior report stating that a 4 1/414-inch screw taped on one end and two broken tweezers were found underneath some papers at the bottom of petitioner's locker following a search of his cell provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Scott v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 648, 656 N.Y.S.2d 953). A reasonable inference of possession arises from the fact that the contraband was found in an area within petitioner's control, even though access to the area may not have been exclusive (see, Matter of Stile v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 693, 727 N.Y.S.2d 736; Matter of Scott v. Coombe, supra ). Although petitioner denied “knowledgeable intent” that the contraband was present, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Stile v. Goord, supra ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 29, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)