Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Salvador GALDAMEZ, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Gouverneur Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with making false statements and being out of place. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
The misbehavior report, authored by the correction officer who observed and ascertained the facts of the incident, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Muniz v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d 1073, 1073-1074, 820 N.Y.S.2d 368 [2006]; Matter of Retamozzo v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 31 A.D.3d 1083, 1084, 819 N.Y.S.2d 199 [2006] ). Allegedly exculpatory evidence offered by petitioner regarding the nature of his conduct created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Haigler v. Goord, 39 A.D.3d 921, 922, 835 N.Y.S.2d 461 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 802, 840 N.Y.S.2d 762, 872 N.E.2d 875 [2007]; Matter of Nina v. Selsky, 35 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 825 N.Y.S.2d 589 [2006] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)