Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ALIM LISHEN LAQUAN R. (Anonymous), a/k/a Alim R. (Anonymous), a/k/a Alim W. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, respondent; Frances Denise R. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, inter alia, to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), entered August 8, 2008, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated May 29, 2008, made after a hearing, finding that she had permanently neglected the subject child, and after a dispositional hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and SCO Family of Services for the purpose of adoption. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 29, 2008.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing established, by clear and convincing evidence, that she permanently neglected her child by continuing to abuse marijuana for four years following his removal from her custody and by failing to plan for his future (see Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Sarah Jean R., 290 A.D.2d 511, 512, 736 N.Y.S.2d 410). Notwithstanding the diligent efforts of the Department of Social Services to help reunite the family, the mother refused to cooperate with rehabilitation programs, repeatedly declined to submit to drug testing, and tested positive for marijuana on numerous occasions. By her actions, the mother failed to plan for her child's return (see Matter of Laura F., 48 A.D.3d 812, 852 N.Y.S.2d 388).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 16, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)