Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CHANTAL M. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Leonel M. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Gleacy M. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Leonel M. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2). In the Matter of Glendyann M. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Leonel M. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3).
In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hamill, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated January 25, 2005, made after a hearing, found that he sexually abused the subject child Gleacy M. and neglected the subject children Glendyann M. and Chantal M., placed the father under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months, and released the children to the mother's custody for a period of 12 months under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review the fact-finding order.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the father under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months and released the children to the mother's custody for a period of 12 months under the supervision of the Administration of Children's Services is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as those portions of the order of disposition expired by their own terms; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
Based upon our review of the record and deferring to the Family Court's resolution of credibility issues (see Matter of Sharonda S., 301 A.D.2d 532, 752 N.Y.S.2d 898; Matter of Cassandra C., 300 A.D.2d 303, 750 N.Y.S.2d 322), we conclude that the Family Court's determination that the appellant sexually abused Gleacy is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct. Act § 1046[b][1], [a][vi]; Matter of Jaclyn P., 86 N.Y.2d 875, 635 N.Y.S.2d 169, 658 N.E.2d 1042; Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 117, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914; Matter of Cassandra C., supra; Matter of Katherine S., 271 A.D.2d 538, 705 N.Y.S.2d 670; Matter of Vincent I., 205 A.D.2d 878, 879, 613 N.Y.S.2d 488).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 21, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)