Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jameel BUTLER, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barbaro, J.), rendered February 15, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his waiver of the right to a jury trial was inadequate is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Lumpkins, 11 A.D.3d 563, 782 N.Y.S.2d 804, lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 746, 790 N.Y.S.2d 658, 824 N.E.2d 59; People v. Magnano, 158 A.D.2d 979, 551 N.Y.S.2d 131, affd. 77 N.Y.2d 941, 570 N.Y.S.2d 484, 573 N.E.2d 572, cert. denied 502 U.S. 864, 112 S.Ct. 189, 116 L.Ed.2d 150). In any event, the record does not support the defendant's contention that the waiver was invalid (see People v. Brunson, 307 A.D.2d 323, 324, 762 N.Y.S.2d 509; People v. Davis, 277 A.D.2d 248, 249, 715 N.Y.S.2d 649; People v. Wheeler, 258 A.D.2d 542, 683 N.Y.S.2d 892). After the court recessed to allow the defendant and his counsel time to discuss the jury waiver and to resolve their differences, defense counsel informed the court, in the defendant's presence, that the defendant wished to proceed with a nonjury trial. The defendant concedes that he signed the written jury waiver in open court. The written jury waiver stated that the defendant requested that he be tried without a jury, that he was advised of the rights he was giving up, and that he signed the waiver voluntarily, knowingly, and of his own free will.
Although the record does not reveal precisely what his attorney told him concerning the rights he would be relinquishing and the trial judge did not allocute the defendant, nothing in the record indicates that the defendant was unaware of the consequences of his waiver (see People v. Brunson, supra; People v. Wheeler, supra ). The waiver was executed in open court and the surrounding circumstances support the conclusion that his waiver was knowing and voluntary (cf. People v. Davidson, 136 A.D.2d 66, 525 N.Y.S.2d 855). Based on the circumstances revealed in the record, the “written waiver is sufficient and is not invalidated by the court's failure to inquire” (People v. Burnett, 136 A.D.2d 888, 524 N.Y.S.2d 938).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 04, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)