Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Edith PENDULIK, appellant, v. EAST HAMPTON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated December 17, 2003, as granted the motion of the defendants East Hampton Union Free School District and John M. Marshall Elementary School for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondents.
The 80-year-old plaintiff was invited into the “multi-purpose room” of the John M. Marshall Elementary School to attend an awards ceremony for her grandson's class. She was injured when a third-grade student who was attending a physical education class simultaneously conducted in the same room backed into her and knocked her over while he and a friend were playing catch with a ball.
We agree with the respondents that the plaintiff cannot recover against them based upon a theory of negligent supervision of students, since the plaintiff failed to establish the existence of a special duty owed to her by the respondents (see Goga v. Binghamton City School Dist., 302 A.D.2d 650, 754 N.Y.S.2d 739; Firestein v. Gavlyayev, 282 A.D.2d 430, 722 N.Y.S.2d 589; Feinsilver v. City of New York, 277 A.D.2d 199, 715 N.Y.S.2d 441; Sampson v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 255 A.D.2d 434, 680 N.Y.S.2d 594). However, in opposition to the respondents' prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to whether the respondents were negligent in scheduling a physical education class and an awards ceremony simultaneously in the same room, and whether, under the circumstances, school personnel adequately monitored the activities in the room so as to prevent foreseeable injuries to invited guests such as the plaintiff (see generally Morbillo v. Board of Educ. of Mt. Sinai School Dist., 269 A.D.2d 506, 703 N.Y.S.2d 241; Griffin v. County of Orange, 210 A.D.2d 585, 619 N.Y.S.2d 814; Rotz v. City of New York, 143 A.D.2d 301, 532 N.Y.S.2d 245).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 04, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)