Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daphne CLARK, Respondent, v. CHAU SHING WONG, et al., Appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barron, J.), dated August 16, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant building owners to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she allegedly fell on a loose plastic runner covering the stairs at the premises. The defendants moved for summary judgment arguing that they neither created the alleged condition nor had actual or constructive notice of it. The Supreme Court denied the motion finding issues of fact. We affirm.
The defendants failed to meet their initial burden of establishing their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The deposition transcript of the defendant Sing Kit Wong, which was annexed to the defendants' motion, raised an issue of fact as to whether they had actual knowledge of a recurring dangerous condition and therefore could be charged with constructive notice of each specific recurrence (see Osorio v. Wendell Terrace Owners Corp., 276 A.D.2d 540, 714 N.Y.S.2d 116; Benn v. Municipal Housing Authority for City of Yonkers, 275 A.D.2d 755, 713 N.Y.S.2d 544; O'Connor-Miele v. Barhite & Holzinger, 234 A.D.2d 106, 650 N.Y.S.2d 717). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment.
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 22, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)