Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Keith BOWERS, Petitioner, v. D. VENETTOZZI, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following an altercation with another inmate, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violent conduct, assault, fighting and refusing a direct order. At the tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty with explanation to each of the charges and asserted a justification defense. Ultimately, petitioner was found guilty and an administrative penalty was imposed. Although the penalty subsequently was modified, petitioner's administrative appeal otherwise proved unsuccessful, prompting him to commence this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination.
We confirm. Given petitioner's plea and the testimony of the correction officers who responded to quell the violent conduct, we conclude that the determination of guilt was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Ramirez v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d 601, 818 N.Y.S.2d 867 [2006]; Matter of Calhoun v. Goord, 20 A.D.3d 628, 628-629, 798 N.Y.S.2d 212 [2005] ). Petitioner's contrary claim that he acted only in self-defense and did not willingly re-engage in the fighting, as the correction officers testified, presented a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Carter v. Goord, 8 A.D.3d 771, 772, 778 N.Y.S.2d 234 [2004] ). Petitioner's remaining claims, including his claim of hearing officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 11, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)