Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Gary W. JUERGENS, Respondent. Pharmflex Inc., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 22, 1998, which ruled that PharmFlex Inc. was liable for additional employment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and to all other persons similarly employed.
Claimant worked as a marketing representative, calling on physicians for PharmFlex Inc., a pharmaceutical marketing business. He was initially compensated at the rate of $17.50 for each doctor called upon and PharmFlex reimbursed expenses incurred by him. Later his compensation was changed to $20 per call and no expenses were reimbursed. He was paid every two weeks, worked in an exclusive marketing territory, attended sales meetings at which training was provided, filled out daily reports which were submitted to PharmFlex on a weekly basis, was frequently furnished with memoranda from PharmFlex containing instructions detailing how his work was to be performed, was prohibited from marketing other products when calling on doctors for PharmFlex, was prohibited from making more than 10 calls per day but required to make at least 25 calls per week on the doctors who appeared on the list furnished through PharmFlex from one of its pharmaceutical customers, but he would not be compensated for calling on any doctor not on the list.
This proof constitutes substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's finding of an employment relationship (see, Matter of Atac [Fashion Realty Group, Commissioner of Labor], 265 A.D.2d 777, 697 N.Y.S.2d 398), which mandates affirmance of the Board's determination notwithstanding that the record contains evidence of an independent contractor status and that claimant's contract identified him as such (see, Matter of Wassey [Kenmark Opt. Co., Commissioner of Labor], 255 A.D.2d 650, 680 N.Y.S.2d 272; Matter of Braunstein [Dinaire Corp., Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 899, 672 N.Y.S.2d 522).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)