Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Michelle F. RHODE, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 24, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
Claimant is the sole officer and shareholder of a real estate company incorporated on March 7, 1997 as a subchapter S corporation. This business was run out of claimant's home. At the time the business was incorporated, claimant was employed with an investment company. Claimant subsequently ended employment with this company under nondisqualifying circumstances in April 1997 and filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
The record reveals that claimant, while receiving unemployment insurance benefits, purchased a computer, a corporate kit, office equipment, office supplies and opened a cellular phone account. As claimant stood to gain financially from her activities in furtherance of the operation of the business, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision denying claimant unemployment insurance benefits notwithstanding the fact that the corporation was not profitable (see, Matter of Bezdezowksi [Commissioner of Labor], 271 A.D.2d 794, 706 N.Y.S.2d 212). Furthermore, inasmuch as claimant failed to report these business activities despite having attended an orientation and receiving instructions explaining the unemployment insurance reporting requirements, the finding that she made willful false statements to obtain benefits is supported by substantial evidence and properly recoverable (see, Matter of Donaghy [Commissioner of Labor], 264 A.D.2d 883, 695 N.Y.S.2d 203). Claimant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, PETERS, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)