Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Vicki LEWIS, Appellant. Strathmore Directories Ltd., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that she was discharged due to misconduct. According to the employer, a week before claimant's termination, she was advised by her supervisor that her productivity was low and the employer would like it to be increased. She was informed that low productivity would be grounds for dismissal. On claimant's last day of work her supervisor asked her to speak to him in private. The supervisor testified that it was his intent to again warn claimant about her low productivity. Claimant refused to speak privately with her supervisor and then basically told him to go ahead and say she was fired.
In our view, claimant's actions in inviting her own discharge constituted misconduct under the circumstances presented (see, Matter of Khasidova [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 675, 671 N.Y.S.2d 173; Matter of Bissell [Electronic Data Sys. Corp.-Hudacs], 199 A.D.2d 699, 605 N.Y.S.2d 414). Claimant's differing version of the events leading up to her discharge created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Khasidova [Commissioner of Labor], supra). Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 09, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)