IN RE: the Claim of Charles REDDEN (2000)

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment after the employer discovered that claimant had falsely represented on his employment application that he had never been convicted of any felonies or misdemeanors.   The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he lost his employment due to misconduct.   Notwithstanding claimant's proffered excuse that the failure to disclose his criminal history was due to an oversight, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Napolitano [Commissioner of Labor], 264 A.D.2d 928, 695 N.Y.S.2d 208;  Matter of Class [Alliant Food Serv.-Commissioner of Labor], 261 A.D.2d 772, 689 N.Y.S.2d 781).

Claimant's remaining contentions, including his claim of abuse of discretion on the part of the Administrative Law Judge in reopening the matter following the employer's initial default (see, Matter of Scott [New York City Dept. of Personnel-Commissioner of Labor], 265 A.D.2d 777, 697 N.Y.S.2d 195), have been examined and found to be similarly unpersuasive.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.