Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: REGAN & REGAN P.C., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 30, 1997, which assessed Regan & Regan P.C. for additional unemployment insurance contributions based upon the earnings of its corporate officers for the audit period from July 1, 1992 through December 31, 1994.
Regan & Regan P.C. (hereinafter R & R) is a professional service corporation engaged in the practice of law. For Federal income tax purposes, it is a subchapter S corporation, closely held by two shareholders who are partners in the law firm. One shareholder serves as the corporation's president while the other serves as its corporate secretary. In these roles, both individuals performed corporate administrative duties for which they were compensated during the period in question by the payment of equal shares of the corporation's net profits.
This appeal arises out of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that R & R was liable for unemployment insurance contributions for the period in question based upon the remuneration paid to its corporate officers. Although R & R contends that its corporate officers were not engaged in “employment” within the meaning of Labor Law § 511(1)(a), it is well settled that a corporation is liable for the payment of unemployment insurance contributions based upon remuneration paid to individuals who perform the duties of corporate officers (see, Matter of Ellenbogen Computer Servs. [Hudacs], 202 A.D.2d 825, 609 N.Y.S.2d 384; Matter of Preferred Computer Trading Corp. [Hartnett], 173 A.D.2d 1031, 570 N.Y.S.2d 368; Matter of Salamanca Nursing Home [Roberts], 117 A.D.2d 903, 499 N.Y.S.2d 229, affd. 68 N.Y.2d 901, 508 N.Y.S.2d 939, 501 N.E.2d 588). These payments are, in turn, deductible from the corporation's gross income as business expenses (see, 26 USC § 162[a] ). Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Board which is, accordingly, affirmed.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MIKOLL, Justice Presiding.
MERCURE, WHITE, YESAWICH and PETERS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)