Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent, v. Lisa M. LUCANO, appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for supplementary underinsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated December 22, 2003, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant failed to obtain the petitioner's written consent prior to settlement of the underlying negligence action and execution of a release which failed to preserve the petitioner's subrogation rights (see Matter of Integon Ins. Co. v. Battaglia, 292 A.D.2d 527, 739 N.Y.S.2d 590; Friedman v. Allstate Ins. Co., 268 A.D.2d 558, 703 N.Y.S.2d 198; Weinberg v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 379, 477 N.Y.S.2d 99, 465 N.E.2d 819; cf. Matter of American Home Assur. Co. v. Williams, 282 A.D.2d 674, 723 N.Y.S.2d 409). Thus, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellant was precluded from asserting a claim for benefits under the supplementary underinsured motorist provision of the petitioner's insurance policy.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, her belated verification that no excess insurance was available did not obviate the prejudice to the petitioner's subrogation rights since the tortfeasors were not judgment proof (see Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Danaher, 290 A.D.2d 783, 785, 736 N.Y.S.2d 195; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Brown], 288 A.D.2d 955, 732 N.Y.S.2d 612).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 12, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)