Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Harriet BERLAND, on Behalf of Dan BERLAND, Deceased, Appellant, v. P. MACKNER & COMPANY et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 22, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that the death of claimant's decedent was not causally related to a prior accident and denied the claim for workers' compensation benefits.
We are unpersuaded that the Workers' Compensation Board erred in disallowing claimant's claim upon a finding of no causal relationship between the January 27, 1997 death of claimant's husband (hereinafter decedent) and a December 11, 1952 accident that resulted in injury to decedent's legs. Decedent's death certificate indicates that the immediate cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest due to cardiac arrest and atherosclerotic heart disease, and massive cerebrovascular accident and massive gastrointestinal bleeding were listed as significant contributing conditions. Although claimant did submit some medical records, none addressed the pivotal issue of the causal connection between the 1952 accident and decedent's death from a heart condition in 1997. Under the circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant failed to satisfy her burden of coming forward with prima facie medical evidence of a causal relationship between the two events (see generally, Matter of Zivitz v. J & S Meat Corp., 114 A.D.2d 709, 710, 494 N.Y.S.2d 539, affd. on mem below 67 N.Y.2d 868, 501 N.Y.S.2d 663, 492 N.E.2d 791). The parties' additional contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MERCURE, J.P.
PETERS, SPAIN, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 19, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)