IN RE: HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY (2007)

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated June 26, 2007, which denied the petition.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition to permanently stay the arbitration is granted.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the petition for a permanent stay of arbitration since the respondents failed to file a sworn statement with the petitioner insurance company within 90 days of the alleged hit-and-run accident, in accordance with the requirement of the uninsured motorist endorsement of the subject insurance policy.   The respondents thus failed to satisfy a condition precedent of coverage under the policy, and are not entitled to arbitrate their claim seeking coverage (see Matter of Eveready Ins. Co. v. Mesic, 37 A.D.3d 602, 831 N.Y.S.2d 426;  Matter of Empire Ins. Co. v. Dorsainvil, 5 A.D.3d 480, 481, 772 N.Y.S.2d 565;  Matter of Legion Ins. Co. v. Estevez, 281 A.D.2d 420, 721 N.Y.S.2d 273;  Matter of Aetna Life & Cas. v. Ocasio, 232 A.D.2d 409, 648 N.Y.S.2d 159;  Matter of State Farm Ins. Co. v. Velasquez, 211 A.D.2d 636, 637, 621 N.Y.S.2d 357).  “Moreover, the fact that the petitioner received some notice of the accident by way of an application for no-fault benefits did not negate the breach of the policy requirement” (Matter of Eveready Ins. Co. v. Mesic, 37 A.D.3d at 603, 831 N.Y.S.2d 426;  see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Estate of Aziz, 17 A.D.3d 460, 461, 793 N.Y.S.2d 138;  Matter of American Home Assur. Co. v. Joseph, 213 A.D.2d 633, 624 N.Y.S.2d 250).

The petitioner's remaining contention need not be addressed in light of our determination.