Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Cedric REID, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats and harassment after he sent to the Commissioner of Correctional Services a letter containing offensive and obscene references. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, subject correspondence, corroborating hearing testimony and petitioner's own admission that he authored and sent the letter constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Canzater-Smith v. Selsky, 28 A.D.3d 899, 900, 813 N.Y.S.2d 254 [2006] ). To the extent that petitioner offered an innocent explanation regarding the content of the letter and a retaliation defense, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rizzuto v. Goord, 35 A.D.3d 1075, 1075, 825 N.Y.S.2d 592 [2006] ). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the offending references were not protected expressions under the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (see Matter of Jones v. Department of Correctional Servs. of State of N.Y., 283 A.D.2d 805, 805-806, 724 N.Y.S.2d 793 [2001] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 27, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)