Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Denise McHARRIS, appellant, v. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, et al., respondents.
In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother's cousin appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Anixiadis, R.), dated June 14, 2007, which, without a hearing, denied her petition for custody of the subject children, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 29, 2007, which, without a hearing, denied her petition for visitation with the subject children.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The subject children have been living in foster care since June 2003. Parental rights were terminated and they were freed for adoption in February 2006. In December 2006, the appellant, the cousin of the mother of the subject children, petitioned for custody of the children. In February 2007, the appellant petitioned for visitation with the children.
The Family Court properly denied the petition for custody without a hearing, “as the appellant's recourse was to seek adoption, not mere custody,” of the children (Matter of Snypes v. Administration for Children's Servs., 308 A.D.2d 593, 765 N.Y.S.2d 519; see Matter of Patience B. v. Administration for Children's Servs., 306 A.D.2d 473, 761 N.Y.S.2d 304; Matter of Irons v. Ford, 289 A.D.2d 576, 577, 735 N.Y.S.2d 808; Matter of Annie H., 207 A.D.2d 788, 789, 616 N.Y.S.2d 521; Social Services Law § 384-b [11] ). The Family Court also properly denied the petition for visitation without a hearing, since parental rights had already been terminated and the children had been freed for adoption upon the termination of parental rights, and upon the placement of the subject children into a pre-adoptive home, the legislature clearly limited the right to seek visitation to noncustodial parents, grandparents, and siblings. Thus, the appellant, as the mother's cousin, lacked standing to petition the Family Court for visitation with them (see Matter of Jessica F., 7 A.D.3d 708, 710, 777 N.Y.S.2d 198; Matter of Katrina E., 223 A.D.2d 363, 636 N.Y.S.2d 53; Family Ct. Act § 1081; Domestic Relations Law §§ 71, 72).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 29, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)