Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald DEFEO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Platkin, J.), entered January 24, 2008 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying his request to participate in the family reunion program.
Following the execution-style shooting of his parents and four siblings, petitioner was convicted of six counts of murder in the second degree and is currently serving a term of 25 years to life in prison. After marrying his second wife, he applied for participation in the family reunion program at the correctional facility where he is incarcerated. His application was denied and the denial was upheld on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that the denial was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Petitioner now appeals.
We affirm. As an initial matter, we note that decisions regarding participation in the family reunion program are “heavily discretionary” (Matter of Doe v. Coughlin, 71 N.Y.2d 48, 55-56, 523 N.Y.S.2d 782, 518 N.E.2d 536 [1987], cert. denied 488 U.S. 879, 109 S.Ct. 196, 102 L.Ed.2d 166 [1988] ) and will be upheld if they have a rational basis (see Matter of Stacione v. Baker, 24 A.D.3d 843, 804 N.Y.S.2d 278 [2005]; Matter of Georgiou v. Daniel, 21 A.D.3d 1230, 1231, 801 N.Y.S.2d 421 [2005] ). Among the factors to be considered are whether the petitioner “has ‘been convicted of heinous or unusual crimes' ” (Matter of Couser v. Goord, 1 A.D.3d 663, 664, 766 N.Y.S.2d 461 [2003], quoting 7 NYCRR 220.2[c][1] [iii] ). The denial in the instant case was based upon this factor and is completely rational considering the brutal nature of the crimes committed by petitioner (see e.g. Matter of Williamson v. Nuttall, 35 A.D.3d 926, 927, 825 N.Y.S.2d 802 [2006]; Matter of Payne v. Goord, 12 A.D.3d 733, 734, 783 N.Y.S.2d 702 [2004] ). We find no merit to petitioner's constitutional claims. Consequently, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)