Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sheila GREENBERG, appellant, v. GARDEN JEWISH CENTER OF FLUSHING, INC., et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated June 6, 2005, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendant Dance Connection, Inc., and the separate motion of the defendant Garden Jewish Center of Flushing, Inc., which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The defendants established, prima facie, that they did not create the alleged defect or have actual or constructive notice of the specific condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall (see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774). In response, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to defeat their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff's mere speculation that the floor was not properly waxed was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Khaimova v. Osnat Corp., 21 A.D.3d 401, 799 N.Y.S.2d 779; Ventriglio v. Staten Is. Univ. Hosp., 6 A.D.3d 525, 774 N.Y.S.2d 571; Tomol v. Sbarro, Inc., 306 A.D.2d 461, 761 N.Y.S.2d 845; Guarino v. La Shellda Maintenance Corp., 252 A.D.2d 514, 675 N.Y.S.2d 374). Even assuming that the plaintiff's expert, who first examined the accident site more than five years after the accident, was qualified in the field of floor care, his affidavit was speculative, conclusory, and insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Van Skyock v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Co., 265 A.D.2d 545, 697 N.Y.S.2d 145; Guarino v. La Shellda Maintenance Corp., supra ).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendants' motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 12, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)