Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Keith HART, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered March 18, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of escape in the first degree.
While defendant was serving a 25-year to life prison sentence in Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County, he and four other inmates escaped from the facility. Following defendant's apprehension, prison disciplinary proceedings were initiated resulting, inter alia, in his confinement to the special housing unit for 15 years (see, Matter of Hart v. Coombe, 229 A.D.2d 754, 645 N.Y.S.2d 901, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 802, 653 N.Y.S.2d 279, 675 N.E.2d 1232). Defendant was also charged with various crimes. He pleaded guilty to the crime of escape in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 31/212 to 7 years to run consecutively to the prison term he was then serving. Defendant appeals.
Initially, we note that defendant does not dispute the fact that his criminal prosecution following the administrative proceeding was not barred under double jeopardy principles (see, e.g., People v. Vasquez, 89 N.Y.2d 521, 529, 655 N.Y.S.2d 870, 678 N.E.2d 482, cert. denied sub nom. Cordero v. Lalor, 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. 131, 139 L.Ed.2d 80). Nevertheless, defendant maintains that the penalties imposed administratively and criminally, while permissible separately, violate the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions. We disagree. As previously indicated, defendant's administrative penalty has been upheld and, in our view, “this is not one of those ‘exceedingly rare circumstances where the disciplinary sanction imposed [was] grossly disproportionate to the interests of government’ to warrant barring the subsequent criminal prosecution for the same conduct” (People v. Taylor, 235 A.D.2d 719, 720, 653 N.Y.S.2d 385, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1101, 660 N.Y.S.2d 395, 682 N.E.2d 996, quoting Matter of Cordero v. Lalor, 227 A.D.2d 848, 849, 642 N.Y.S.2d 399, affd. sub nom. People v. Vasquez, 89 N.Y.2d 521, 655 N.Y.S.2d 870, 678 N.E.2d 482, cert. denied 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. 131, 139 L.Ed.2d 80).
Finally, we find no merit to defendant's claim of cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Federal Constitution (see, People v. Motter, 235 A.D.2d 582, 589, 653 N.Y.S.2d 378, 384, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1038, 659 N.Y.S.2d 869, 681 N.E.2d 1316). Significantly, defendant agreed to the 31/212-to 7-year sentence as part of the plea bargain and we find it to be appropriate in view of the nature of the crime and defendant's prior criminal record. Furthermore, it was less than the harshest sentence statutorily permissible.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CARDONA, Presiding Justice.
WHITE, CASEY, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)