Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Reginald TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. Charles DUFRAIN, as Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination which, after a tier II hearing, found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Respondents argue that the proceeding is untimely. We agree.
Petitioner concedes in his petition that he received the denial of his administrative appeal on April 15, 1999. Inasmuch as August 15, 1999 was a Sunday, the last day for the commencement of this proceeding within the applicable four-month Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 217) was August 16, 1999 (see, General Construction Law § 25-a [1] ). Petitioner did not verify his petition until that date, when he also mailed the petition and an unsigned copy of the order to show cause to the Franklin County Clerk's office. The papers were not received until August 19, 1999. The order to show cause was not executed until August 27, 1999 and it was filed four days later. Petitioner does not claim that his incarceration prevented him from timely commencement or otherwise explain the delay. Therefore, the proceeding was not timely commenced (see, Matter of Wright v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 876, 694 N.Y.S.2d 494; Matter of Shell v. McCray, 261 A.D.2d 664, 690 N.Y.S.2d 305).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs and petition dismissed.
SPAIN, J.
CREW III, J.P., PETERS, CARPINELLO and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 21, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)