Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Henry McCOY, Jr., et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. Cynthia JENKINS, Appellant,
et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) IN RE: Cynthia JENKINS, Appellant, v. Archie SPIGNER, et al., Respondents-Respondents, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
In related proceedings to invalidate and validate a petition designating Cynthia Jenkins as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 1997, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of City Council Member 27th Council District, Queens County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated August 14, 1997, which, after a nonjury trial, granted the petition to invalidate in Proceeding No. 1 and denied the petition to validate in Proceeding No. 2.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly granted the petition to invalidate the petition designating Cynthia Jenkins as a candidate in the primary election for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of City Council Member 27th Council District, Queens County. At trial, the notary public who witnessed the signatures to the designating petition refused to answer questions concerning the administration of the oath to the signatories and when asked if he committed forgery, replied that he could not recall. In addition, several other inquiries were made of this witness which were highly pertinent to the alleged irregularities of his actions, for which he professed no recollection, all of which supports the trial court's determination as to this witness' lack of credibility.
Since the invalidation of the signatures collected by this individual results in the number of valid signatures falling below the 900 required by statute, the designating petition was properly declared to be invalid (see, Election Law § 6-136 subd. 2[c-1]; Matter of Zunno v. Fein, 175 A.D.2d 935, 573 N.Y.S.2d 527).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)