Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy S. HELM, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered April 20, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated as a felony in satisfaction of a multicount indictment and was sentenced to a term of 1 1/3 13 to 4 years in prison and assessed a $5,000 fine. Defendant contends that the sentence is harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice given the fact that the People had recommended that he be sentenced to a short jail term and a lengthy probationary period. Notably, in accepting defendant's plea, County Court made no specific promises and warned defendant of all its sentencing options. Given, inter alia, the recommendation in the presentence report and defendant's extensive criminal history, which includes numerous alcohol-related driving offenses and failed probationary sentences, we find no abuse of discretion with respect to County Court's imposition of a prison term and no extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention (see, People v. Hamm, 249 A.D.2d 623, 671 N.Y.S.2d 539). Nevertheless, we reach a different result with respect to the fine imposed, which was the statutory maximum (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193[1][c][i] ). Inasmuch as there is no dispute that defendant is indigent and qualified for assigned counsel, a situation that the People assure us is only possible in Franklin County for persons with incomes at or below the poverty level, we conclude that a reduction in the fine to the minimum permissible amount of $1,000 is appropriate under the circumstances presented here (see, People v. Jennette, 128 A.D.2d 955, 956-957, 513 N.Y.S.2d 269, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 951, 516 N.Y.S.2d 1034, 509 N.E.2d 369).
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the fine imposed to $1,000, and, as so modified, affirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)