Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Chris HYNES, Petitioner, v. Roy GIRDICH, as Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following petitioner's transfer from another correctional facility, correction officers confiscated certain documentation that was discovered while unpacking petitioner's belongings. Petitioner thereafter was charged in a misbehavior report with violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from providing legal assistance without approval and possessing other inmates' crime and sentencing information. Petitioner was found guilty of both charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was upheld upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the underlying determination ensued.
Initially, we agree with petitioner that substantial evidence does not support the determination of guilt with respect to the charge of providing legal assistance without approval. The only proof of such charge was the misbehavior report and testimony of the law library supervisor, which indicated that petitioner was in possession of legal papers involving other inmates. This, without more, does not establish that petitioner provided unauthorized legal assistance to such inmates (see Matter of Hendrix v. Williams, 256 A.D.2d 1117, 684 N.Y.S.2d 730 [1998] ). However, the confiscated documentation, which is included in the record, does substantiate the remaining charge insofar as it contains crime and sentencing information pertaining to another inmate. Although the determination must be modified, remittal for a redetermination of the penalty is not required inasmuch as there was no recommended loss of good time and petitioner already has served the penalty (see Matter of Zhang v. Murphy, 1 A.D.3d 784, 766 N.Y.S.2d 633 [2003]; Matter of Michaelides v. Goord, 300 A.D.2d 718, 719, 749 N.Y.S.2d 906 [2002] ). In view of our disposition, we need not address petitioner's remaining claim.
ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of providing legal assistance without approval; petition granted to that extent and respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 16, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)