Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John O. CUMMINGS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
A search of petitioner's cell was ordered after an anonymous note was received by a correction sergeant claiming that petitioner had a weapon secreted under his locker. During the search, a 5 1/414-inch piece of sharpened metal, which appeared to be a dust broom handle, was discovered under petitioner's large locker. Petitioner was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon, possessing an altered item and damaging state property. A tier III disciplinary hearing was held at which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it and the correction sergeant who received the anonymous note, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Vann v. Goord, 308 A.D.2d 611, 612, 764 N.Y.S.2d 219 [2003]; Matter of Folk v. Goord, 307 A.D.2d 500, 501, 761 N.Y.S.2d 885). “Although other inmates had access to petitioner's locker, a reasonable inference of possession arises when contraband is found in an area within an inmate's control” (Matter of Alston v. Goord, 4 A.D.3d 708, 709, 771 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2004] [citation omitted]; see Matter of Shackleford v. Goord, 3 A.D.3d 622, 623, 769 N.Y.S.2d 910 [2004] ). Petitioner's contention that the weapon must have been planted under his locker by someone presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Alston v. Goord, supra at 709, 771 N.Y.S.2d 919; Matter of Davis v. Senkowski, 306 A.D.2d 778, 761 N.Y.S.2d 538 [2003] ). Petitioner's remaining claims are unpreserved due to his failure to raise them at the hearing or on administrative appeal and, in any event, are unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 16, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)