Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Brian MORGAN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit smuggling and providing false information. According to the misbehavior report, a small balloon fragment fell from petitioner's buttocks during a strip search. Petitioner then denied that it came from him. The misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing and the inferences to be drawn therefrom provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477 [1990]; Matter of Price v. Goord, 301 A.D.2d 986, 754 N.Y.S.2d 453 [2003]; Matter of Cole v. Selsky, 269 A.D.2d 717, 704 N.Y.S.2d 672 [2000] ).
We reject petitioner's assertion that he was denied due process because the balloon fragment was not produced at the hearing. Inasmuch as it was not destroyed in bad faith but, rather, as a result of reasonable procedures used to test for controlled substances, he was not improperly denied access to the evidence (see Matter of Harris v. Selsky, 236 A.D.2d 723, 724, 654 N.Y.S.2d 423 [1997] ). Petitioner's request for production of an unusual incident report was properly denied as there was no indication that any such report existed (see Matter of Dawes v. McClellan, 223 A.D.2d 890, 636 N.Y.S.2d 489 [1996] ).
We are also unpersuaded by petitioner's contention of hearing officer bias. Even in light of the Hearing Officer's remarks and other conduct challenged by petitioner, our review of the hearing transcript fails to establish that the outcome of the hearing flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of McClean v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 846, 662 N.Y.S.2d 277 [1997]; Matter of Taylor v. Selsky, 242 A.D.2d 772, 661 N.Y.S.2d 843 [1997] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 23, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)