Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: George J. FERRARA, deceased. Salvation Army, appellant; Dominick Ferrara, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103, inter alia, to disclose and recover certain assets alleged to be a part of the decedent's estate, the Salvation Army appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Rockland County (Weiner, S.), dated April 15, 2004, which, after a hearing, upon a finding that a power of attorney pursuant to which certain transfers of assets were made was valid, and upon a decision of the same court dated March 31, 2004, dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, with costs.
“The relationship of an attorney-in-fact to his [or her] principal is that of agent and principal ․ and, thus, the attorney-in-fact must act in the utmost good faith and undivided loyalty toward the principal, and must act in accordance with the highest principles of morality, fidelity, loyalty and fair dealing ․ Consistent with this duty, an agent may not make a gift to himself [or herself] or a third party of the money or property which is the subject of the agency relationship” (Semmler v. Naples, 166 A.D.2d 751, 752, 563 N.Y.S.2d 116 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted] ). “ ‘Such a gift carries with it a presumption of impropriety and self-dealing, a presumption which can be overcome only with the clearest showing of intent on the part of the principal to make the gift’ ” (Semmler v. Naples, supra, quoting Matter of DeBelardino, 77 Misc.2d 253, 256, 352 N.Y.S.2d 858, affd. 47 A.D.2d 589, 363 N.Y.S.2d 974; see Matter of Naumoff, 301 A.D.2d 802, 754 N.Y.S.2d 70; Mantella v. Mantella, 268 A.D.2d 852, 701 N.Y.S.2d 715).
The power of attorney signed by the decedent specifically authorized such gifts in accordance with General Obligations Law § 5-1503 permitting modifications to the statutory short-form power of attorney. Further, competent evidence was adduced at the hearing to support the respondents' contention that the decedent specifically authorized the distribution of his funds to the respondent Dominick Ferrara.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 11, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)