Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Anthony L. STRADER, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 20, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he left his employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left his employment as an office manager without good cause. Dissatisfaction with one's salary or rate of pay does not constitute good cause for leaving one's employment (see Matter of Hughes [Commissioner of Labor], 37 A.D.3d 966, 966, 829 N.Y.S.2d 752 [2007]; Matter of Luta [Commissioner of Labor], 305 A.D.2d 786, 787, 759 N.Y.S.2d 800 [2003] ). Here, claimant resigned after he learned that he would be paid $12 per hour, rather than time and a half, for any voluntary overtime hours he worked. Inasmuch as claimant admitted that he did not discuss the rate of pay for voluntary overtime at the time he was hired and that no specific rate had been promised to him, his claim that the overtime rate of $12 per hour constituted a substantial change in the terms of his employment is unavailing (cf. Matter of Robert [Commissioner of Labor], 239 A.D.2d 809, 810, 657 N.Y.S.2d 266 [1997] ). Furthermore, claimant did not establish that he was entitled to overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (see 29 USC § 213[a][1]; 29 CFR 541.200). The record reveals that, as an office manager, claimant earned a salary of $28,000 per year, exempting him from the Fair Labor Standards Act (see 29 USC § 213[a] [1]; Matter of Conners [Commissioner of Labor], 9 A.D.3d 703, 705, 779 N.Y.S.2d 827 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 609, 786 N.Y.S.2d 812, 820 N.E.2d 291 [2004], cert. denied 544 U.S. 1034, 125 S.Ct. 2273 [2005] ).
Finally, inasmuch as claimant reported that he separated from his employment due to lack of work when, in fact, he had resigned, substantial evidence also supports the Board's finding that claimant made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits (see Matter of Peters [Commissioner of Labor], 42 A.D.3d 615, 616, 839 N.Y.S.2d 307 [2007]; Matter of Greco [Commissioner of Labor], 286 A.D.2d 796, 729 N.Y.S.2d 813 [2001] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 27, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)