Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Laurie G. BAIRD, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 28, 2007, which ruled that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely.
After quitting her part-time job, claimant was terminated from her full-time job. She applied for unemployment insurance benefits and, on October 17, 2006, the Department of Labor mailed an initial determination denying her claim. The reverse side of the initial determination advised claimant that a request for a hearing had to be made within 30 days of the date it was mailed. Claimant, however, did not request a hearing until April 6, 2007. The Commissioner of Labor objected to the timeliness of the hearing, which was ultimately sustained by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Claimant appeals.
We affirm. Pursuant to Labor Law § 620(1)(a), a claimant has 30 days within which to request a hearing after the date of mailing of the initial determination (see Matter of Ricketts [Commissioner of Labor], 47 A.D.3d 1177, 849 N.Y.S.2d 458 [2008] ). In the case at hand, claimant made her request for a hearing well outside the 30-day time period and did not provide a reasonable excuse for her delay (see Matter of McCarthy [Commissioner of Labor], 39 A.D.3d 993, 993, 835 N.Y.S.2d 462 [2007]; Matter of Palumbos [Commissioner of Labor], 32 A.D.3d 1060, 820 N.Y.S.2d 669 [2006] ). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: August 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)