Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CRYSTAL ROXY LYNN D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Marguerite D. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Ricky D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Marguerite D. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).
In two related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (McLeod, J.), both dated March 3, 1999 (one as to each child), as, upon two fact-finding orders of the same court, both dated February 6, 1998 (one as to each child), made after a hearing, determined that she had abused her daughter Crystal Roxy Lynn and derivatively abused her son Ricky. The appeals from the orders of disposition bring up for review the fact-finding orders.
ORDERED that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner carried its burden of proving by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the mother abused her daughter Crystal Roxy Lynn (see Family Ct. Act § 1012[e][i]; 1046[b][i]; Matter of Michael R., 228 A.D.2d 684, 646 N.Y.S.2d 269). That evidence included the mother's criminal conviction for attempted assault in the third degree of Crystal Roxy Lynn.
The mother's conduct demonstrated such an impaired level of parental judgment so as to create a substantial risk of harm to any child in her care. Accordingly, the finding of derivative abuse as to her son Ricky was appropriate (see Matter of Brian B., 283 A.D.2d 424, 723 N.Y.S.2d 882; Matter of Khabira B., 271 A.D.2d 606, 707 N.Y.S.2d 339).
The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 01, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)