Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Bernard JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized possession of a narcotic or controlled substance after a search of his cell disclosed a quantity of powder which laboratory tests subsequently identified as heroin. Petitioner asserts that the determination should be annulled on the ground that the search of his cell violated the terms of Department of Correctional Services Directive 4910(V)(C)(1) (hereinafter the directive), which provides that when a cell search is conducted in a general confinement housing unit and the inmate is removed from the cell during the search, the inmate is to be permitted to observe the search unless, in the opinion of a supervisory security staff member, the inmate presents a risk to the facility's security (see, Matter of Gonzalez v. Wronski, 247 A.D.2d 767, 768, 669 N.Y.S.2d 421; Matter of Llull v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 761, 762 n. 2, 656 N.Y.S.2d 479, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 804, 661 N.Y.S.2d 831, 684 N.E.2d 281). It is uncontested that the correction officers who conducted the search compelled petitioner to leave his cell and that he was not permitted to observe the search. Respondents attempt to justify this procedure by arguing that petitioner was not entitled to witness the cell search because he was housed in the special housing unit where the provisions of the directive do not apply (see, Matter of Adams v. Bennett, 279 A.D.2d 919, 920, 719 N.Y.S.2d 618, lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 712, 729 N.Y.S.2d 439, 754 N.E.2d 199).
Respondents' contention is not supported by the record. The misbehavior report clearly states that a search was conducted of cell 2-E-12, not cell 1-E-28, as asserted by respondents.1 There is nothing in the record to indicate either that the search was conducted in the special housing unit or that a determination was ever made by a supervisory staff member that petitioner posed a danger to the security of the facility. Accordingly, we find that the terms of the directive were violated. As it is well settled that respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services must adhere to his own regulations (see, Matter of Bryant v. Coughlin, 77 N.Y.2d 642, 647, 569 N.Y.S.2d 582, 572 N.E.2d 23; Matter of Garcia v. Le Fevre, 64 N.Y.2d 1001, 1003, 489 N.Y.S.2d 48, 478 N.E.2d 189), the determination must be annulled and the matter expunged from petitioner's disciplinary records.
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and respondents are directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional records and to reimburse petitioner the mandatory surcharge.
FOOTNOTES
1. It would appear from the inmate misbehavior report that cell 1-E-28 is the cell into which petitioner was placed after the search of cell 2-E-12 revealed contraband.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 01, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)