Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Raynard CARAWAY, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules after he initiated an attack on another inmate in the mess hall. Petitioner pleaded guilty to engaging in violent conduct, creating a disturbance, possessing a weapon and disobeying a direct order and, following a tier III hearing, was found guilty of assaulting an inmate. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting this proceeding.
Initially, petitioner's plea of guilty to engaging in violent conduct, creating a disturbance, possessing a weapon and disobeying a direct order prevents him from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to those charges (see Matter of Billue v. Goord, 28 A.D.3d 845, 812 N.Y.S.2d 175 [2006]; Matter of Carini v. Selsky, 19 A.D.3d 718, 719, 796 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2005] ). The misbehavior report, the supporting memorandum and petitioner's own admissions provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt on the remaining charge (see Matter of Price v. Goord, 29 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 814 N.Y.S.2d 409 [2006]; Matter of Ford v. Smith, 23 A.D.3d 829, 805 N.Y.S.2d 663 [2005], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 708, 813 N.Y.S.2d 44, 846 N.E.2d 475 [2006] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report complied with 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 even though it did not contain a statement that the inmate that petitioner attacked retaliated by hitting petitioner with a mess hall tray, nor did such omission prevent petitioner from offering a defense or undermine the sufficiency of the proof (see Matter of Gonzalez v. West, 29 A.D.3d 1245, 816 N.Y.S.2d 220 [2006]; Matter of Torres v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 759, 759, 691 N.Y.S.2d 210 [1999] ), inasmuch as such information was included in the supporting memorandum (see Matter of Sabater v. Selsky, 4 A.D.3d 705, 706, 772 N.Y.S.2d 733 [2004] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 09, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)