Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Zev ASCH, respondent, v. Laura ASCH, appellant.
In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated June 24, 2005, which sustained the father's objections to so much of an order of the same court (Rodriguez, S.M.) dated March 16, 2005, as, after a hearing, directed the father to pay 68% of the costs of the college expenses and extracurricular activities of the parties' children, and instead, found that the father was not obligated to pay the costs of extracurricular activities of the parties' children, directed that the parties equally share the costs of the children's college expenses, and directed that the children be covered under the father's medical insurance plan.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The parties entered into a separation agreement which provided, among other things, that the father would pay to the mother weekly child support and contribute to the cost of the children's college education. The agreement did not address expenses for extracurricular activities. Since 2001, when the separation agreement was entered into, the costs associated with the extracurricular activities of the parties' son have substantially increased. The mother sought to have the father contribute to the costs of those expenses.
The mother failed to meet her burden of showing that there had been an unanticipated and unreasonable change of circumstance or that the children's needs were no longer being met. As such, modification of the terms of the separation agreement was not warranted (see Matter of Boden v. Boden, 42 N.Y.2d 210, 213, 397 N.Y.S.2d 701, 366 N.E.2d 791).
The mother's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, not otherwise properly before this court, or without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 13, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)