Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SHU-JUAN QI, etc., et al., appellants, v. Mohammed A. RAHMAN, et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated March 2, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence is denied, and that cause of action is reinstated.
The decedent, Yumin Qi (hereinafter the decedent), sustained fatal injuries when he allegedly fell from a ladder while attempting to access the roof of the defendants' two-family house. The decedent was present for the purpose of providing an estimate to the defendants for the cost of repairs to the roof. The subject ladder belonged to the defendants. The plaintiffs commenced the instant action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death. Thereafter, the defendants moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence. By order dated March 2, 2005, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the motion. We reverse the order insofar as appealed from.
In support of that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence, the defendants were required to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572). The defendants failed to sustain their burden, and we need not consider the sufficiency of the papers submitted in opposition. Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)